There is a growing interest in both employee-driven innovation (EDI) and innovation in welfare
services, but a lack of empirical studies addressing innovation from the employee perspective.
Accordingly, this study was designed to contribute with well-grounded empirical knowledge, aiming
to explore the barriers to and opportunities for participation in innovation experienced by employees
of the Swedish welfare services. In order to reach the aim, a qualitative thematic analysis of
27 semi-structured interviews with employees in four municipalities was performed.
The study identified three main themes, with a great impact on the innovative performance of the
studied organizations: support, including leadership and innovation processes; development, including
creativity and learning; and organizational culture, which includes attitudes and communication, all essential
ingredients in EDI. Experienced barriers for innovation were unclear or non-existing innovation
processes with ambiguous goals, insufficient learning, and deficient organizational slack, thus creating
a tension between day-to-day work and innovation and hindering reflection and exploration.
Attitudes of colleagues and lack of communication were also barriers to implementing innovation,
suggesting the need for better management support for a communicative and open culture.
Opportunities were found, including commitment to innovation and willingness to try new ideas,
but the employees must be given the mandate and sufficient time to develop the potential that
emerges from continuous learning, time for reflection, and user dialogue. The conclusion was that
incremental innovations existed, but the full potential of these did not benefit the entire organization
due to inadequate communication and lack of innovation processes.
The study improves our understanding of how employees regard their involvement in innovation.
It also discusses how to make better use of employees? resources in innovation processes and
contributes to important knowledge about EDI in the public sector. On the basis of our results, we
suggest a model of EDI for use in practice.
Author Biographies
Thomas Wihlman, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, M?lardalen University
PhD student
Magnus Hoppe, School of Business, Society and Engineering, M?lardalen University
PhD
Ulla Wihlman, Independent Researcher, Stockholm
DrPH
H?l?ne Sandmark, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, M?lardalen University