Can High-involvement Innovation Practices improve Productivity and the Quality of Working-life simultaneously? Management and Employee Views on Comparison
This paper examines the association of high-involvement innovation practices (HIIPs) and simultaneous
improvement of productivity and the quality of working life (QWL). HIIPs refer to work,
managerial, and organizational practices that are intended for supporting continuous improvement
and broad participation. The data are based on the evaluation surveys carried out by the
Finnish Workplace Development Programme TYKES (2004?2010). TYKES was a governmental
programme for promoting simultaneous improvements in productivity and the QWL in workplaces
through changes in work, managerial, and organizational practices. Information obtained
via two different surveys has been combined for the purposes of this article: a survey on HIIPs
within a work organization (HIIP) and a self-assessment survey of project outcomes (SA). The
survey material comprises altogether 253 responses from 163 different workplaces. The analysis
provides evidence in favor of a view that publicly funded workplace development projects constitute
appropriate means to support productivity and the QWL simultaneously. The results provide
evidence that HIIPs, including decentralized decision making, competence development, internal
cooperation, and external cooperation, are of importance when trying to gain better results in both
productivity and the QWL from both management and employees? point of view. In addition, the
development process itself, that is, how the practices are implemented and good skills in project
management, is highlighted. Concerning the supervisor?s supportive role in employees? innovation
activities, the picture is more mixed and surprising.