This article describes how the flexicurity arrangement of low job security, high employment security,
and good income security advocated by various authors affects the mental well-being of employees.
Data are derived from a survey carried out in 2010?2011 among employees in Finland, Norway, and
Sweden. The main findings are that all three forms of cognitive security (the perceived risk) have an
independent effect on mental well-being and that the worry of insecurity (the affective component)
mediates the relationship with mental well-being. The interaction effects show that high levels of
employment security can alleviate the detrimental effects of job insecurity on mental well-being. No
similar interaction effect was found with job insecurity and income security. The results are discussed
in relation to the institutional arrangements of the Nordic countries? welfare states, concluding that the
high employment security needed for a successful flexicurity arrangement requires either low levels of
unemployment or effective and extensive active labor market programs. Flexicurity is thus susceptible
to economic turmoil and requires further labor market investments, even in the Nordic countries.
Author Biographies
Patrik Vulkan, Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg
Doctoral Candidate
Antti Saloniemi, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere
Professor
J?rgen Svalund, Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research
Researcher
Anna V?is?nen, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere